To Live, Not Exist

RSS | Random | Archive

About Me

tomorrow i will run faster, stretch out my arms farther. i can also beat your seven evil ex's.

ask me anything

Blogs I follow:

Theme by: Miguel

  1. i think about you now and then; 
    about what could’ve been. 
    i have some regrets. 

    i’m sure, 
    at some point, 
    you’ll have at least one too.

    2. 7 Notes

  2. this is great.

    (Source: gotemcoach)

    3. 91 Notes
    Reblogged: ravenbirddd

  3. surprised by who i saw at the mall yesterday. her face is the definition of inflection; she’d make a terrible liar—but she’s too sweet to be one anyways. i looked to my right and our eyes locked for a few seconds. we didn’t smile, we didn’t wave. i didn’t cause i didn’t recognize her. i wonder if she recognized me, it’s been quite some time. shoulda blown her a kiss. haha, i will if i see her again.

    i just hope, whoever she ever meets is always fully aware of how precious she is.

    4. 2 Notes

  4. (Source: gifs-from-movies)

    5. 171808 Notes
    Reblogged: abchanti

  5. (Source: sonotorious)

    6. 2 Notes
    Reblogged: sonotorious
    7. 1171 Notes
    Reblogged: sonotorious
  7. truth.

    truth.

    8. 101036 Notes
    Reblogged: alissaphoto

  8. i keep swimming through
    what to tell you, hopefully
    cupid knows his cue

    9. 6 Notes

  9. wonder when i’ll see 
    you again, stop having a
    boyfriend—i’m better

    10. 6 Notes

  10. "Any theory of life has to explain how the laws of physics can give rise to a complex flying machine like a bird or a bat or a pterosaur, a complex swimming machine like a tarpon or a dolphin, a complex burrowing machine like a mole, a complex climbing machine like a monkey, or a complex thinking machine like a person.
    Darwin explained all of this with one brilliantly simple idea - natural selection, driving gradual evolution over immensities of geological time. His is a good theory because of the huge ratio of what it explains (all the complexity of life) divided by what it needs to assume (simply the nonrandom survival of hereditary information through many generations). The rival theory to explain the functional complexity of life - creationism - is about as bad a theory as has ever been proposed. What it postulates (an intelligent designer) is even more complex, even more statistically improbable than what it explains. In fact it is such a bad theory it doesn’t deserve to be called a theory at all, and it certainly doesn’t deserve to be taught alongside evolution in science classes."

    - richard dawkins
    11. 3 Notes